My penultimate assignment in the course
Understanding Media by Understanding Google on
Coursera centered on the localization of news, books, politics, heroes, etc based on the convenience of generation Y and Z, to easily access them on their mobile. Thus, because a lot of people today are finding it harder to let go of their mobile devices (%75 of Americans are with their phones for up to 20 hours daily), there's that debate whether if peering in to phones in the middle of a task, is beneficial and deepening that original task because the person is engaged; or it is a distraction from the original task, because the individual is bored. Find my argument below:
Owen Youngman posits, that the new
"local"
will no longer be defined by physical attributes, but by convenience
and ease or the use of less effort, especially in accessing news, or
relevant information via digital media; albeit the ease that comes on
our mobile devices. However, more than often, because we feel that
"local" can go around with us in our pockets, mobile could begin to
define "multi-tasking". I disagree with this growing notion, therefore, I
opine that if someone instinctively and repeatedly picks up a mobile
device to consume media (or conduct Google searches) while engaged in
another activity, he/she is
bored and seeking
to be distracted from the first activity.
Before
completing this assignment, I had not totally taken a look at all
relevant course materials for the week, because I had a hashtag
conference project, and had to do the reports before the end of the
financial year, today. Thus, moving from one article, to watching Joe
Kraus' video and then unto Youngman's seemed like a man seeking for
answer from all materials at the same time --
"multi-tasking"
like Joe Kraus said in his video. However, after four hours of that plus
taking breaks to look at my tab, reply tweets, watch some Mexico vs
Netherlands battle it out in Brazil, I had just written the first
paragraph of this assignment, albeit, with the other assertion that "I
was being engaged, and seeking to enhance and deepen the first
activity".
But there could not be any better example to buttress
my point than my own very experience, because after taking 45 minutes
out to read Nicholas Carr's "Is Google making us Stupid" and another 20
minutes in keenly watching Kraus' video, I am now able to drop the
report writing for my assignment, knowing that I'm not really
multi-tasking,but distracting myself from accomplishing either tasks.
Thus, because I feel that switching from one article to the other could
quickly help me reach my answer faster, achieving
"efficiency" and "immediacy" like Mr. Carr writes, results in me achieving nothing in the end.
The
conclusion is that I have had to abandon the report for my assignment,
and I'm glad to say that after 2 hours of reading and watching the
course materials, I didn't only get better grasp of the question, I am
able to complete my assignment before deadline, after which I shall now
pursue my report writing in earnest.